Today's hottest deals

HP 500-054

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 500-054  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory10.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '17 at 16:57
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 111
54% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 178
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
EVGA(3842 3677) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 35
Parallax 43.6
29% 37.9 fps
MRender 48.9
Gravity 41
Splatting 36
34% 41.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
679GB free
Firmware: AX0P3D Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 85.2
Write 93.4
Mixed 85.7
66% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.18
61% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 62%
WD WD6400AADS-00M2B0 640GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 83.6
Mixed 67.7
62% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.42
95% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173CB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-054 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-054

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback