Today's hottest deals

Asrock A88M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive23.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A88M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 07:15
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 51.9
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 109
44% 74.3 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 190
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 1313) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.9.3
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 9.7
6% 8.17 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.4
6% 6.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 49 72 36 59 71 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.3% Poor
Read 146
Write 73.8
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 57.8
17% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 16.2
35% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 48.7
DQ Write 48.4
DQ Mixed 19.7
23% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 78%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
905GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 158 160 158 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 149
Write 129
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 158
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 13.3
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A88M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback