Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemECT
MotherboardMSI B150M PRO-VD D3 (MS-7981)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150902
Uptime12 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 13:40
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 213
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 636
64% 520 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Gigabyte(1458 3795) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.5% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 130
Parallax 121
95% 123 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 126
Splatting 112
91% 111 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC120G1CS1754D117-551 120GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS111101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 395
Write 293
Mixed 260
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 10
82% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 176
159% 241 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 90%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
24GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 484
Write 456
Mixed 434
102% 458 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 53.5
185% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 325
246% 331 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Generic S300 Hard drive 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 180 184 185 187 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 164
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 184
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.8% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.8
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback