Pcware IPMH110P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPcware IPMH110P  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON IPMH110P
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '21 at 19:49
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$36
Socket 1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 73
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 75.6
47% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 152
18% 141 Pts
64-Core 88.9
6% 88.9 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)
Device(1B0A 01CE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
1.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 5.1
0% 3.07 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 6.5
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.47%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 14 55 239 286 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 334
Write 264
Mixed 270
SusWrite 104
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 14.8
60% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 31.6
62% 122 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 92%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
202GB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 101 81 107 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 76.8
Write 79.2
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 101
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
186% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
3GB free
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14.7
Write 39.1
Mixed 8.2
15% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 39%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.6
Write 8.7
Mixed 13.7
16% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD44G240082 0420 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.4% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH110P Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Pcware IPMH110P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback