Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3337U 33,616 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	53.8% Above average	Memory 77.8 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 101 53% 81.9 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 175 23% 175 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 0813) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.18% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.7 3% 2.77 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.18% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CHN mSATAM3 512 512GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 246GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1016A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 107 60 9.7 55 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 351 Write 378 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 106 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.7 32% 7.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Elpida 12GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	46.6% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 14.9 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 13.2 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 84.6 47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-3337UIntelBench 47%, 33,616 samples	23x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	23x

SSD
SMS151S324G 24GBKingstonBench 44%, 205 samples	3x
MZMPD256HAGM-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 72%, 232 samples	1x
LMT-128M6M mSATA 128GBLiteonitBench 72%, 1,674 samples	1x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1NGG/2G Elpida 6GBKingstonBench 42%, 62 samples	5x
ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G Elpida 8GBKingstonBench 50%, 65 samples	5x
Elpida 12GBUnknownBench 40%, 16 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16