Dell Studio XPS 9100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory22GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 22GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio XPS 9100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05DN3X
Memory14.1 GB free of 22 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101021
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 29 '17 at 07:40
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$157
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 71
2-Core 89.5
47% 73.9 Pts
4-Core 89.8
8-Core 146
14% 118 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Lighting 27.9
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 34
23% 31 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 37.1
25% 29.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
443GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.41% Terrible
Read 3.41
Write 29.4
Mixed 4.8
9% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.004
4K Write 0.19
4K Mixed 0.005
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
56% Above average
Read 95.9
Write 99.5
Mixed 84.5
70% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
30GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
56% Above average
Read 100
Write 94.9
Mixed 102
75% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-654.A00LF 9905403-654.A00LF ACR256X64D3U1333C9 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 ACR128X64D3U1333C9 ACR128X64D3U1333C9 22GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 8.7
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 9100 Builds (Compare 423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Dell Studio XPS 9100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback