| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
| Graphics | 1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Wibtek G41-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111125 |
| Uptime | 2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 11 '21 at 13:37 |
| Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$18
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
17% 22.9 Pts
|
5% 39.4 Pts
|
3% 43.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
1.78%
Terrible
|
2% 1.97 fps
|
2% 2.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VM100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 28 28 19 31 30 MB/s
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
22% 29.5 MB/s
|
119% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
|
13.9%
Very poor
|
14% 4.8 GB/s
|
11% 3.9 GB/s
|
17% 236 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical G41-M Builds (Compare 9 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Wibtek G41-M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples | 2x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $50Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 2x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $53Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 2x |
| GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples | 1x |
| GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $63 |