| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 500-326na (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2B17 |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20140904 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 12 '21 at 16:14 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 44% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
50.2%
Above average
|
51% 83.5 Pts
|
23% 179 Pts
|
13% 206 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
15% 19.2 fps
|
14% 17.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 359 344 351 354 356 MB/s
|
72.7%
Very good
|
80% 355 MB/s
|
79% 26.4 MB/s
|
164% 229 MB/s
|
|
OEM Ext Hard Disk 749GB
150GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 3.1 0.4 0.4 0.4 MB/s
|
15.2%
Very poor
|
15% 20.7 MB/s
|
117% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.9%
Below average
|
33% 11.7 GB/s
|
22% 7.53 GB/s
|
40% 98.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 500-326na Builds (Compare 13 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 500-326na
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 11x |
| Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples | 1x |
| R9 390XAMD $340Bench 54%, 26,573 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $155 |