Today's hottest deals

HP ProBook 650 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP ProBook 650 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 856E
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 13:43
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 26%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 131
60% 97 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 275
30% 240 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
HP(103C 856E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 5.2
4% 5.23 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.4
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H2Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,496
Write 1,135
Mixed 1,041
272% 1,224 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 36.2
117% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 309
223% 281 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x5D07] W-Z4Y85AA 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.2% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 20.6
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 15.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 650 G5 Builds (Compare 375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 650 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback