Gigabyte B460M AORUS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 132% UFO	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 124% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte MD34932
Motherboard	Gigabyte B460M AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '21 at 20:10
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180 44,448 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 92.7 2-Core 170 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 610 58% 480 Pts	64-Core 935 58% 935 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% MSI(1462 3896) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4775 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	181% Outstanding	Lighting 263 Reflection 237 Parallax 264 214% 255 fps	MRender 282 Gravity 221 Splatting 165 176% 223 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
E12-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B27-BB1 1TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 716GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1258 947 975 987 973 930 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	203% Outstanding	Read 1,274 Write 2,168 Mixed 1461 SusWrite 1,012 335% 1,479 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 59.7 198% 70.2 MB/s	DQ Read 757 DQ Write 538 DQ Mixed 690 504% 662 MB/s
Poor: 174% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 263%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 911GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 165 173 169 174 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 159 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 170 99% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GU6CJR8N-XN 2x16GB 276 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 27 86% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 20.1 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B460M AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,922 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 115%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte B460M AORUS PRO - $95

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	589x
Core i5-10400Intel $130Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	322x
Core i7-10700Intel $233Bench 93%, 71,010 samples	155x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	185x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	152x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	141x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	49x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	43x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	112x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	80x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $711

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16