Asus X555QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus X555QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555QA
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 02:54
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 41.9
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 109
40% 71 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 171
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 122E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.64% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 11.4
6% 8.57 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 6.1
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.64%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 375 329 154 156 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 406
Write 388
Mixed 344
SusWrite 247
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 23.9
92% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 230
173% 231 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-4GRS Samsung M471A5143EB1-CPB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.4% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 8.4
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 8.3
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X555QA Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback