Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 19:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 870K
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 55
1-Core 69
2-Core 128
48% 84 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 203
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Gigabyte(1458 21F2) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.41% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 5.1
7% 7.17 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 6.5
5% 6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.41%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 93 103 101 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 43.8
Write 111
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 76.2
46% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
36% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3 Kingston KHX1600C10D3L 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.6% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 14.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-S1 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback