Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

Performance Results

Gaming 49%
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 19:50
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 465
62% 465 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 86.9
54% 74.6 fps
MRender 61.6
Gravity 62
Splatting 43.2
44% 55.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 39 31 26 32 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 345
Write 236
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 62
39% 179 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 11.5
43% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 14.9
DQ Mixed 16.3
14% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$22
447GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 129 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 161
Write 127
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 128
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 25.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 25.4
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2H Builds (Compare 2,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 30%
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 25%

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback