Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B360M HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B360M-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M HD3  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateJan 20 '21 at 20:27
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 240
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 665
72% 573 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.57% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 7.3
5% 6.7 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.6
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.57%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 490
Write 377
Mixed 8.5
64% 292 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 24.6
61% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 44
85% 167 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
320GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 389 431 392 428 435 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 457
Mixed 374
SusWrite 415
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 47.2
160% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 343
257% 342 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.CAGP7.B7C0B 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 4.9
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M HD3 Builds (Compare 700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback