Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DD
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '21 at 20:35
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 112
2-Core 224
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 554
57% 462 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 46.6
Parallax 21.2
13% 27.9 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 13.7
12% 14.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6256G 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: EDFM20.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 974 1040 559 210 194 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,065
Write 812
Mixed 1,034
SusWrite 530
193% 860 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 66.9
229% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 522
DQ Mixed 742
528% 677 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 175%
Great: 246%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
749GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 111 110 102 90 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 136
Write 138
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 104
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
236% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 79%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
1TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 102 100 102 96 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 90.7
Write 55.9
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 99.4
103% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
162% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 64%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 8.3 7.4 7 7.7 7.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 87
Write 18.9
Mixed 28
SusWrite 8.7
37% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.1
91% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD D4H4GS26A8 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.5% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 19.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 18
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD Builds (Compare 366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback