Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20150

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20150  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 14:22
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 136
58% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 173
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 155 133 154 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 417
Write 96.5
Mixed 181
SusWrite 153
46% 212 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 19.3
73% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 62.4
DQ Mixed 79.7
70% 109 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
21GB free
Firmware: ES2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 74 71 54 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 74.8
Write 73
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 70.4
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 46%
DISK 16GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 17 18 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
9.41% Terrible
Read 29.5
Write 12.5
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 18.9
23% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.8% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 11.5
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20150 Builds (Compare 840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback