ADD TO PC
BUILD

Aaeon UP-APL01

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Aaeon UP-APL01 (all builds)
Motherboard	AAEON UP-APL01
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201014
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '21 at 15:55
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 207 User benchmarks, average bench 19% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Memory 39.3 1-Core 45.1 2-Core 93.5 34% 59.3 Pts	4-Core 92.4 8-Core 93.5 12% 92.9 Pts	64-Core 93.7 6% 93.7 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.18% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 2.3 2% 2.4 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 5.5 3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.18% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500MS120G 120GB 533 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RR SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 82 63 77 65 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 354 Write 309 Mixed 218 SusWrite 80.9 54% 241 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 9.1 65% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 99.8 DQ Mixed 89.2 75% 110 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 79%
General UDisk 16GB 4,718 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID null, Eastfun SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 9.3 9.4 9.3 8.5 9.4 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	5.11% Terrible	Read 15.7 Write 6.7 Mixed 3.3 SusWrite 9 10% 8.67 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.11% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung / Micron K4F8E304HB-MGCJ / MT53E256M32D2DS-053 4x1GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB Chip LPDDR4 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 5.5 18% 6.17 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 205 20% 205 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback