HP 1000 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP 1000 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1854
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 16:47
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1000M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 99.1
48% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 98.7
8-Core 98.2
13% 98.4 Pts
64-Core 97.1
6% 97.1 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1854) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3304
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 108 85 85 69 77 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.7% Above average
Read 237
Write 171
Mixed 189
SusWrite 99.4
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 26.2
95% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 41.8
62% 118 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3020EF48E8W1333 Adata AM1U16BC2P1-B1AH 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.3% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 1000 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback