Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 09:18
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 204
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 613
55% 462 Pts
64-Core 605
37% 605 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 25.1
14% 18.1 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 13.9
12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 17 32 14 18 95 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.6% Poor
Read 226
Write 114
Mixed 106
SusWrite 42.6
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 12
50% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 19.1
DQ Mixed 18
14% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 100%
OOS1000G 1TB
480GB free
Firmware: OOS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 128 129 130 130 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 98
Write 58.4
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 126
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 110%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB
295GB free
Firmware: 5438
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 35.4
Mixed 29
SusWrite 14.6
21% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 77%
WD Elements 1.5TB
324GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 32.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 14.7
36% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 22%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0110
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 33.7
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 13
36% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback