Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardJGINYUE B85I PLUS
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 11:33
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 378
51% 381 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 31.4
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 39.9
26% 34.8 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 33.4
31% 38.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 333 116 27 37 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 446
Write 423
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 98.5
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 12.5
61% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 26.7
DQ Mixed 30.2
31% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 102%
Nvme 512GB 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: T0707A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 869 1014 1096 1092 1075 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,204
Write 949
Mixed 854
SusWrite 1,004
225% 1,002 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 27.7
167% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 857
DQ Write 712
DQ Mixed 518
461% 696 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 193%
Great: 260%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown-159.A01LF 0012 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.9% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.2
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback