Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55t-A (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130916
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '21 at 19:18
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	58%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1005M 3,385 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Memory 40.6 1-Core 41.3 2-Core 66.3 30% 49.4 Pts	4-Core 83.7 8-Core 78.9 11% 81.3 Pts	64-Core 81.2 5% 81.2 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FA20) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.3% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.1 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.9 2% 2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.3% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 75 77 77 84 82 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34% Below average	Read 171 Write 59.4 Mixed 85.6 SusWrite 80.3 22% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 11.5 58% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 58.4 DQ Mixed 29.6 45% 87.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3170EB68E9W1600 Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.4 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.57 GB/s	Latency 200 20% 200 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 1005MIntelBench 44%, 3,385 samples	13x
Core i3-4000MIntel $259Bench 51%, 7,973 samples	10x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	6x

GPU
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	19x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	10x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	9x

SSD
SSDPro 240GBBlackpcsBench 75%, 61 samples	3x
easystore 480GBWDBench 50%, 1,196 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	5x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GBSamsungBench 46%, 219 samples	4x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	4x