TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Studio XPS 1647

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Studio XPS 1647  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0W61J1
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100511
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 20:45
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 450
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 122
47% 81.1 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 155
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 40.3%
 Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Dell(1028 0419) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 2.2
4% 4.77 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 3.51%
 Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB160G4T 160GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D201DL10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 180 186 185 186 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 192
Write 184
Mixed 164
SusWrite 181
41% 180 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 16.3
61% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 168
126% 167 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 44.7%
 Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B8HC0NS-BE 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.6
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 24.1%
 Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Studio XPS 1647 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 1647

CPU
Core i5 M 540IntelBench 41%, 8,329 samples13x
Core i5 M 520Intel  $70Bench 40%, 23,644 samples6x
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples6x
GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 2,160 samples29x
Mobility Radeon HD 5730AMDBench 4%, 2,535 samples7x
SSD
PLUS 240 GB 240GBSandiskBench 43%, 24,911 samples4x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples2x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples2x
RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples5x
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples2x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback