Today's hottest deals

Empty empty

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemEmpty empty  (all builds)
MotherboardTYAN S7012
Memory18.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '21 at 08:49
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5649
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 73
2-Core 138
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 439
44% 357 Pts
64-Core 966
60% 966 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
PwrHis(1787 201C) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 35.9
Parallax 43.3
27% 37.5 fps
MRender 29.7
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 24.6
23% 28.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 390 391 389 389 376 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 336
Write 402
Mixed 311
SusWrite 385
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 13.4
44% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 314
243% 331 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 182%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170FH0-CH9 5x4GB
5 of 18 slots used
20GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 5.9
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical empty Builds (Compare 572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback