Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9800P APU (2016 M.BR) 3,040 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	36.8% Below average	Memory 49.9 1-Core 54.2 2-Core 89.6 39% 64.6 Pts	4-Core 136 8-Core 149 19% 143 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42 16,792 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 409 253 157 157 156 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 407 Write 385 Mixed 351 SusWrite 258 79% 350 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 54.1 4K Mixed 29.8 99% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 174 128% 170 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 95%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 902GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 104 104 105 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 129 Write 102 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 103 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.7 253% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:0x9B05 BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FBD 1x16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 6.1 16% 5.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 4.7 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	93x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 6,884 samples	20x
Radeon 500AMDBench 13%, 1,010 samples	20x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	5x

RAM
AO1P21FC8T1-BSKS 1x8GBAdataBench 34%, 7,945 samples	57x
ID:0x9E07 TMA81GS6AFR8N-UHSC 1x8GBUnknownBench 20%, 335 samples	26x
AE4S240038G17-BHYA 1x8GBAdataBench 24%, 359 samples	20x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16