| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | Empty empty (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TYAN S7012 |
| Memory | 28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110923 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 27 '21 at 01:48 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
64.5%
Good
|
59% 99.3 Pts
|
40% 333 Pts
|
31% 503 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 3774) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34%
Below average
|
32% 41.9 fps
|
37% 46.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$52
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 143 147 152 98 133 MB/s
|
34.7%
Below average
|
40% 180 MB/s
|
43% 14.6 MB/s
|
41% 72.3 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-CF8 2x16GB
2 of 18 slots used
32GB DIMM 1066 MHz
|
20.2%
Poor
|
16% 5.73 GB/s
|
20% 6.8 GB/s
|
54% 74.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical empty Builds (Compare 556 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Empty empty
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 38x |
| Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples | 26x |
| Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples | 22x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 51x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 34x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 32x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $84 |