Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Pcsmart AIO Q Smart One (all builds)
Motherboard	PCSMART Pcsmart Q Smart One
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140613
Uptime	19.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '21 at 17:26
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1900 6,116 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	35% Below average	Memory 55 1-Core 22.8 2-Core 45.3 29% 41 Pts	4-Core 89.9 8-Core 88.3 12% 89.1 Pts	64-Core 88.6 6% 88.6 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 0792) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.42% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.6 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.42% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 359GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 64 48 45 51 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 76.8 Write 93.8 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 51 50% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 61%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB 2,276 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.7 8 8.1 8.1 8.3 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	8.49% Terrible	Read 34.3 Write 3.5 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 7.9 13% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 28% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.49% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905469-115.A00LF 1x4GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	20.3% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 6.3 21% 7.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM