TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 1095AR1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 1095AR1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 11:28
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2658 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 55.7
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 112
43% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 426
37% 315 Pts
64-Core 1,075
66% 1,075 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 46.9%
 Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
PNY(196E 0984) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 36.6
23% 32 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 30.4
29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 25.2%
 Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 64GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 109 110 121 107 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.6% Below average
Read 191
Write 126
Mixed 106
SusWrite 109
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 15.9
60% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 45.5
DQ Mixed 47
51% 89.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 37.6%
 Great: 62%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 200GB
186GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.5 6.8 7 6.7 6.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 147
Write 21.8
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 6.9
35% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 44.1%
 Great: 48%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 6.2 7.8 7.7 7.7 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 273
Write 25.7
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 7
61% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 80.1%
 Great: 223%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5270CH0- M393B5273CH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5270CH0- 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.1% Very good
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 26.1
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.5
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 72.1%
 Great: 74%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback