Apple MacBookPro14,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro14,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-B4831CEBD52A0C4C
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 18:05
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7360U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 155
57% 100 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 205
23% 182 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Apple(106B 0174) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
8.95% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 8
Parallax 11.2
9% 10.1 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 9.7
Splatting 11.4
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.95%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256L 251GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXS4KA0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 901 835 916 883 809 818 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,095
Write 1,051
Mixed 555
SusWrite 860
200% 890 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 20.4
84% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 397
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 582
380% 444 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 138%
Great: 380%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D5435324C3531324D3332443250462D3039 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
70.6% Very good
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 19.9
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 12.6
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro14,1 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro14,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback