Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory65.8 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '21 at 07:47
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$138
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 67.6
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
90% 172 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 964
92% 758 Pts
64-Core 1,375
85% 1,375 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 124
Parallax 189
93% 143 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 112
Splatting 79.2
78% 97.7 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1619 960 1229 1316 1303 1288 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,641
Write 2,538
Mixed 1,899
SusWrite 1,286
469% 2,091 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 92.2
310% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,015
DQ Write 804
DQ Mixed 926
688% 915 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 321%
Great: 410%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$145
224GB free
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 435 433 432 433 435 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 427
Mixed 388
SusWrite 433
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 48.3
161% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 183
142% 194 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
392GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 457 456 456 456 455 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 443
Mixed 447
SusWrite 456
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 54.8
181% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
412GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 457 457 456 456 456 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 442
Mixed 430
SusWrite 456
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 57.9
190% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
772GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 456 455 455 455 454 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 444
Mixed 436
SusWrite 455
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 57.7
191% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
ICY BOX IB-366StU3+B 10TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 169 170 172 171 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Tandberg RDX 2TB
989GB free
Firmware: 0253
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 94 95 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 31
SusWrite 93.5
60% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK64GX4M2A2666C16 CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 CMK64GX4M2A2666C16 CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 95GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
32767, 16384, 32767, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.4
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 26.5
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,073
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback