Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99E-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99E-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '21 at 12:49
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 85.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 216
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 771
72% 600 Pts
64-Core 973
60% 973 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
EVGA(3842 4990) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.7% Very good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 107
Parallax 95
75% 98.2 fps
MRender 93.7
Gravity 93.1
Splatting 84.5
74% 90.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$150
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 848
Write 94.3
Mixed 118
75% 354 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 39.8
157% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 50.2
DQ Mixed 164
200% 379 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 243%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
68GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 84 107 80 224 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 446
Write 380
Mixed 269
SusWrite 136
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 17.9
40% 9.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 61%
WD WD15NPVX-00EA4T0 1.5TB
59GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 73 73 71 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 54.4
Write 54.3
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 72.6
39% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 52%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 105 112 107 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 121
Write 104
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 108
139% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.4% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 22.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 19.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99E-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99E-ITX/ac - $371

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,015
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback