Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$68 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 116 2-Core 200 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 400 47% 362 Pts	64-Core 371 23% 371 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 054B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1187 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.6.1 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Lighting 23.5 Reflection 26.4 Parallax 33.2 19% 27.7 fps	MRender 25 Gravity 24.5 Splatting 21.3 19% 23.6 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 120GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 52 53 54 55 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 97.5 Write 88.5 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 52.5 19% 83 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 11.5 40% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.5 DQ Write 14.5 DQ Mixed 14.6 11% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 20%
Virtual Disk 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 160GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 55 57 55 56 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Read 99.5 Write 81 Mixed 90.2 SusWrite 56.2 18% 81.7 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 14.1 4K Mixed 14.8 48% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 17.9 DQ Write 14.1 DQ Mixed 14.9 12% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.9% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 11.2 28% 9.83 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $69Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	38x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	18x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 25,824 samples	14x

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $328