Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion II P560 391 User benchmarks, average bench 40% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	43.2% Average	Memory 74.7 1-Core 34.3 2-Core 46.7 38% 51.9 Pts	4-Core 71.9 8-Core 72.9 10% 72.4 Pts	64-Core 72.3 4% 72.3 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 44%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 922GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 37 10 5.1 4.8 9.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 86.3 Write 60.9 Mixed 51.2 SusWrite 19.9 40% 54.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 71%
Generic 2.0 Reader -SD 2GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 0186 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.8 6.2 6.5 5.3 6.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.69% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 5.5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 6.3 9% 8.12 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 15% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.69% Great: 5%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB 9,471 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 29GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 9 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.51% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 11.9 Mixed 18.1 SusWrite 11.3 20% 15.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 31% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.51% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 10.1 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 91.1 44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16