Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264 13,678 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Memory 84 1-Core 17.3 2-Core 33 36% 44.8 Pts	4-Core 45.2 8-Core 55.9 6% 50.6 Pts	64-Core 32.6 2% 32.6 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 220E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.8 0% 0.63 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.7 1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB 6,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT02L5Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 132 108 136 118 161 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.3% Below average	Read 246 Write 209 Mixed 145 SusWrite 138 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 18 4K Mixed 10.7 40% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 89 DQ Mixed 42.9 50% 88.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3170ME68F9F1600 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.27 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 4.9 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-4300MIntel $264Bench 51%, 13,678 samples	7x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	7x

SSD
THNSFJ256GCSU 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 3,843 samples	2x
MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 81%, 7,649 samples	2x
MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 61%, 6,630 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	1x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 46%, 1,977 samples	1x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GBHynixBench 47%, 645 samples	1x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $264