TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire M1935

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M1935  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M1935
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '21 at 01:25
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G640-$30
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 110
48% 78 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 112
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 43.1%
 Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AAKX-221CA1 494GB
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 34 38 39 43 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 15.4
Write 39.5
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 38.5
21% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 15.5%
 Great: 69%
WD WD5000AAKX-221CA1 494GB
265GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 112 112 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
64% Good
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 113
73% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 64%
 Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
401GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 25 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 24.6
Write 25.1
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 26.7
16% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0
70% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 15%
 Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix Kingston Kingston ACR256X64D3U13C9G Kingston ACR256X64D3U13C9G 12GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Aspire M1935 Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M1935

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples30x
Core i3-2120Intel  $75Bench 51%, 77,810 samples13x
Core i7-2600Intel  $138Bench 67%, 185,630 samples11x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples22x
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples14x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples13x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples7x
BX500 240GBCrucial  $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples6x
MX500 500GBCrucial  $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples5x
RAM
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 57%, 2,366 samples5x
Vulcan 1600 Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 04EF Vulcan 1600 Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 16GBUnknownBench 47%, 8 samples4x
CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 12GBUnknownBench 45%, 11 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback