Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 193%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 239%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics198% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '21 at 06:05
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 158
2-Core 311
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 1,193
107% 901 Pts
64-Core 2,876
178% 2,876 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.6% Above average
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 78.4
Parallax 74.4
63% 76.6 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 60.9
53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 6901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.1.1
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
198% Outstanding
Lighting 263
Reflection 255
Parallax 542
214% 353 fps
MRender 385
Gravity 200
Splatting 290
237% 292 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 198%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
453GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1109 1419 1002 1004 1000 1009 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2,097
Write 1,078
Mixed 965
SusWrite 1,090
290% 1,307 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 50.7
189% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 762
DQ Mixed 490
431% 639 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 240%
Great: 370%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB301D36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 674 1403 1407 157 601 509 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,877
Write 1,484
Mixed 1,272
SusWrite 792
355% 1,606 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 79.1
268% 95.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,069
DQ Write 869
DQ Mixed 1,097
786% 1,012 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 290%
Great: 309%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
875GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 151 150 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 165
Write 171
Mixed 106
SusWrite 147
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
222GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 176 175 178 178 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 140
Mixed 104
SusWrite 171
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 101%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 173 172 171 175 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 181
Write 174
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 167
199% 150 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
173% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 45.6
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 37.7
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 35.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 112%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,905 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $873
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback