Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% rPGA988A Socket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 56.4 1-Core 26.2 2-Core 38.4 29% 40.3 Pts	4-Core 57.1 8-Core 92.4 9% 74.8 Pts	64-Core 86.7 5% 86.7 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0001) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	0.73% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 2.2 0% 1.6 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.2 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.73% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 348GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 55 51 31 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 56 Write 83.8 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 46.5 36% 50 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 57%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 249GB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 19 7.7 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 20 Mixed 16.7 SusWrite 16.5 26% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 4.7 16% 5.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	70x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	1x

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $270