Asrock H67M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock H67M  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '21 at 20:15
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 172
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 331
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
MSI(1462 2125) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
754GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 213 231 228 226 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.5% Good
Read 236
Write 227
Mixed 215
SusWrite 222
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 34
112% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.4
DQ Write 82.2
DQ Mixed 46.2
39% 53.9 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 133%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
923GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 133 131 133 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 127
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 132
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-011.A01LF 9905471-001.A01LF 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H67M - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback