Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 14s-fq0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 14s-fq0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87B8
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '21 at 17:15
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 71.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 279
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 700
76% 604 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 87D0) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.52
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 20.4
12% 17.4 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 17.1
13% 15.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HALB-000H1 1TB
783GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 880 875 835 879 933 895 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,210
Write 1,128
Mixed 1,019
SusWrite 883
238% 1,060 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 25.9
153% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 897
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 686
489% 640 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 174%
Great: 269%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P26KC8T1-BXPS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 31.7
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14s-fq0xxx Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14s-fq0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback