Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '21 at 23:55
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 7,521 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 67.1 1-Core 75.8 2-Core 165 58% 103 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 449 45% 363 Pts	64-Core 452 28% 452 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 4.7 3% 4.47 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 3.7 Splatting 4.7 4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 120GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 66 74 77 82 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 351 Write 244 Mixed 218 SusWrite 90.6 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 9.9 4K Mixed 8.5 29% 9.03 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 34.3 DQ Mixed 24.6 30% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 43.8 MC Write 44.2 MC Mixed 45.8 127% 44.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $350