HP 23-h132la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 23-h132la  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B09
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140513
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '21 at 23:49
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700T APU (2013 D.Ri)-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Memory 50.6
1-Core 23.6
2-Core 45.9
27% 40 Pts
4-Core 72.9
8-Core 67.6
10% 70.2 Pts
64-Core 73.7
5% 73.7 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650D
HP(103C 2B09) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 6.2
4% 5.23 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 88 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 71
SusWrite 87.2
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23-h132la Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 23-h132la

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback