Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-6700T APU (2013 D.Ri)-$88 84 User benchmarks, average bench 47% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Memory 50.6 1-Core 23.6 2-Core 45.9 27% 40 Pts	4-Core 72.9 8-Core 67.6 10% 70.2 Pts	64-Core 73.7 5% 73.7 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650D 65 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 2B09) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	3.71% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 5.1 Parallax 6.2 4% 5.23 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 5.5 4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.71% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: 19.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 88 86 86 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 108 Write 108 Mixed 71 SusWrite 87.2 69% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	19% Very poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 7 16% 5.67 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
A10-6700T APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $88Bench 47%, 84 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 8650DAMDBench 4%, 65 samples	2x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	2x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $88