Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive416% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '21 at 06:54
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$355
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 161
2-Core 331
101% 191 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 1,175
108% 905 Pts
64-Core 2,901
180% 2,901 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.6% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 59.8
48% 59.6 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 59.6
49% 59.7 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
780GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3269 3272 3283 2226 1601 1604 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
416% Outstanding
Read 2,790
Write 3,283
Mixed 3,006
SusWrite 2,542
657% 2,906 MB/s
4K Read 78.5
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 103
336% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,053
DQ Write 937
DQ Mixed 1,015
756% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 416%
Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 68.1
MC Write 45.5
MC Mixed 43.6
150% 52.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 42.8
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 137%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,375
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback