Today's hottest deals

HP 3115-AEC13432GR1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 3115-AEC13432GR1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 188B
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '21 at 08:56
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-300 APU-$120
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Memory 15.9
1-Core 13.2
2-Core 24.5
11% 17.9 Pts
4-Core 26.7
8-Core 28.6
4% 27.7 Pts
64-Core 26.7
2% 26.7 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
HP(103C 188B) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 64 60 55 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
30% Poor
Read 43.5
Write 11.2
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 61
25% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30%
Great: 47%
Flash USB Disk 32GB
20GB free, PID 3a04
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 6.4 7.4 7.5 6.8 7.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6.8
10% 8.18 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1HS 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.91% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.83 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 1.1
4% 1.43 GB/s
Latency 353
11% 353 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3115-AEC13432GR1 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 3115-AEC13432GR1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback