Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150527
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 16 '17 at 08:23
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1840-$92
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 39.8
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 161
50% 94 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 151
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Intel(8086 0402) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 3.06
2% 2.92 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
I-flashdisk M6 64GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0831A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.5% Below average
Read 315
Write 105
Mixed 155
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 3.48
45% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.7
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 3.79
14% 29.7 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung HMT451U6MFR8C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 5.1
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback