Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_A412DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_A412DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412DA
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200908
Uptime19.8 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '21 at 01:40
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 49.8
2-Core 99.2
44% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 64.5
8-Core 19.9
7% 42.2 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Asus(1043 1831) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.09% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.5
5% 3.97 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 6.4
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.09%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1102 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20180000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 252 282 288 283 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 638
Write 278
Mixed 325
SusWrite 273
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 16.8
52% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 494
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 391
284% 375 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.7% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 20.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_A412DA Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_A412DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback