Alienware X51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware X51  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 06G6JW
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '21 at 01:43
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 189
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 366
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19% Very poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 29.3
21% 29.9 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 27.4
Splatting 0.2
15% 21.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 19%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 136 120 109 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 151
Write 125
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 119
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 107%
BUFFALO HD-LXU3 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 01f7
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 25.5
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 27.2
37% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
124% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 80%
Multiple Card Reader 32GB
9GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 18 17 18 17 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 17.2
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 18.2
29% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.7
177% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X51 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Alienware X51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback