Acer Predator G3-605

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator G3-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3-605
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140912
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '21 at 01:10
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 197
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 549
57% 456 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Sapphire(174B 249A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
9.73% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 10.2
10% 12.9 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 12.9
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.73%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
326GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.8% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 41.3
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 41.7
9% 40 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 12.9
40% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.7
DQ Write 23.4
DQ Mixed 14.9
14% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 99%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
81GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 343 310 310 311 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65% Good
Read 377
Write 375
Mixed 326
SusWrite 328
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 25
80% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 99.7
DQ Mixed 110
81% 106 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 131 110 148 150 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 30.5
Write 67.9
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 131
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
121% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 113%
FUJITSU HandyDrive300 250GB
126GB free, PID 113c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 39 38 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 35.9
Write 37.2
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 38.3
47% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.9% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-605 Builds (Compare 1,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback