Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KPL-AM SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM SE  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '21 at 13:47
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron E3400-$19
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 76.7
43% 64.1 Pts
4-Core 81.3
8-Core 80.8
11% 81.1 Pts
64-Core 80.5
5% 80.5 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 24
Parallax 20.3
16% 21.5 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 22
Splatting 16
17% 21 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-512 512GB
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 48 57 65 32 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.7% Poor
Read 173
Write 95.8
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 49.7
22% 100 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 10.8
46% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 11.5
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 16.9
12% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
206GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 49 58 65 33 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 68
Write 70
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 50.5
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM SE Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback