Lenovo 4272CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 4272CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '21 at 01:28
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5630
1366-pin LGA, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 140
58% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 418
40% 332 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 37.7
29% 37.7 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 26.9
27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 180 130 95 75 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.6% Above average
Read 233
Write 214
Mixed 208
SusWrite 124
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 31.9
105% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 121
100% 144 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 126%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
429GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.5% Very poor
Read 28
Write 25.1
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 24.8
6% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 7.6
25% 7.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT1GC72B89A0NF-CG 12x1GB
12 of 12 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4272CTO Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 4272CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $91
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback