Today's hottest deals

Doghouse Armor

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDoghouse Armor  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DX79SR
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '21 at 03:30
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3970X-$244
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 69.5
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 191
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 581
58% 472 Pts
64-Core 717
44% 717 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.3% Very good
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 90.3
Parallax 86.6
79% 91.1 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 80.9
Splatting 72.8
60% 73.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P180509a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 55 69 71 81 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 421
Write 45.8
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 73.9
32% 149 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 22.8
79% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 28.7
DQ Mixed 93.3
65% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x424C53384733443138414453332E313646 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 10.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Armor Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: Doghouse Armor

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback