Today's hottest deals

Kllisre X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardKllisre X79  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200606
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '21 at 10:21
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 192
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 497
53% 420 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 20.9
0% 14.8 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 18.8
14% 16.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 46 39 48 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 67
Write 68.4
Mixed 44.9
SusWrite 47.4
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Dimm2_Manufacturer KRE-D3U1333M/ Dimm3_Manufacturer KRE-D3U1333M/ Dimm6_Manufacturer KRE-D3U1333M/ Dimm7_Manufacturer KRE-D3U1333M/ 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 16.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Kllisre X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback